Thursday
I have of late been concerned by the mental state of Mr Handy. He’s been far too jolly. Either he’s been depressed for the last 20 years or so or he has really "done gone mental" this time. Today I got more evidence of his mental stability, three sure signs of tonto-ness have emerged. He's happy (always a state that suggests that the person isn't in full grasp of the facts), he's been to a doctor! (More of which latter) and he’s written a poem (is the no end to his madness?). Senility? Maybe, and due to his knowledge of all things still worth talking to I find his jolliness and assurances that the "World is fine" to be worrying in the extreme. Its as if a Buddhist Monk got up and started breakdanceing in the city centre. Now I got him to email his poem, I haven’t looked at it, as I hate poetry, but the time has come to see it and as it might provide and insight into his illness, criticise it mercilessly. So cut and paste....
Your face, it launched my million tears, and every day does still.
For your beauty is beyond my endurance, gasp is what I do.
Your lips, your mouth, your tongue, fonts of nectarred lust.
Gods would renounce their heavenly thrones.
From you can come what not from those above. Pretty bad so far
Your breasts, soft mounds of elegance form, so delightfully to inspire.
Your nipple budded circles of textured lust, crowns of my desire. Ah up Duuuurty
Your curves of body, I long to stroke, and touch for love and thrill.
Belly, thrills to hand, fingers loving navel touches, fun and kisses.
Your back, those many lovely hills and valleys, loves strolling ground.
To touch again, again to feel and love, more loving thrills are found.
Your arms, pleasures quiet and still, for touch with softest kiss.
Your vagina, it’s pearl so cutely hidden, your softest lips of love.
The sweetest kiss of my desire, no greater ecstasy ever bidden. God its like listening to your parents "doing it" Though I must say the wife is a pretty "fit bird"
Your derriere, mounds for loving slaps, I long to gently give.
Of course, such precious flesh, only for loving’s most tenderness.
Your lovely legs, sculpted forms so smoothly firm yet soft and warm.
To feel upon my face for thrill, and where ever you might will.
They perch upon your kiss demanding feet, elegance all to toes. Filthy bugger!
Anyway thats poetry for you. Anyway the other file is the ten commandments rewritten and expanded a bit, I wonder if that’s meaningful, 13 at the last supper and thirteen in a coven)..... So here they are.
1. Morality is an attribute of the person. It is not a cultural invention admitting of vor is it an extrinsic imposition. Ok I think I can see where this is going
2. People are sentient self governing entities with desires, ambitions, likes and dislikes. All are born equal. Status is determined only by their acts in life. People act according to the precepts of morality. They are themselves responsible for what they do. Interference with a person’s morally appropriate freedom of action is wrongful. People are not property or chattels. Fair enough
3. People limit their actions to only those which do no harm of any kind to others. However they may when it is morally appropriate interfere with or restrict the freedom of others or harm them in protecting self and others to whom they have a particular or general duty of care. Alister Crowley anyone?
4. Except in the case of chance discovery of peril or harm to another or in response to reasonable request people are not required to offer or render assistance or advice to others. However they may choose to do so, with appropriate restraint, for general benefit to all or to relieve the suffering or distress of particular others. Hummm maybe
5. Where duties to others might appear to conflict a person is required to strike a morally founded balance rejecting all influence from interested parties and rejecting own prejudice bigotry and dogma. A person is not necessarily required to please all or any particular party. If a party or group unreasonably consider that he she or they require preference their interests may be removed from or receive reduced consideration. OK Ben Franklin the second
6. It is wrongful to claim assert or ascribe moral motives to the promotion of support of or involvement in social or religious or political groups. Or to claim assert or ascribe inherent morality in respect of the ideas or beliefs or rules upon which such groups are founded or do seek to promote or impose or to their actions. Such entities are to be judged by their overt and covert effects actions and aims. It is wrongful to seek shelter from responsibility for or to claim rightness of one’s ideas or beliefs or rules or actions under a presumption of the moral rectitude of such groups. Ah now that’s more Machiavellian
7. It is wrongful to claim assert or ascribe moral motives to one’s ideas or beliefs or rules or actions under an assumption of the rightness of society’s approval or practices. One’s ideas or beliefs or rules or actions must stand upon their own moral merit. Maciavelli that seems like the last one
8. It is wrongful to deprive a person of that which is rightfully owned howsoever the deprivation might be brought about. Fair enough
9. It is wrongful to interfere with a person’s right to profit from or enjoy that which is owned howsoever the interference might be applied. yep
10. It is wrongful to deprive a person of opportunity rightfully open to him or her howsoever the deprivation might be brought about. thats society up the creek then, as thats seems to be how it all works
11. It is wrongful to fail to honour freely made agreements. Thats not going to catch on at all, insurance men wouldn’t stand for it
12. It is wrongful to induce a person to make an agreement by deceit See above, unworkable due to incredible beastliness of humans
13. It is wrongful to fail to reveal that circumstances or misunderstanding later discovered render an existing agreement impossible to honour. Errrr ok...
So there you have it pretty conclusive proof of madness, either of the above would be good enough for me but Mr Handy being of the inquiring sort requires other means of verifying things so what would you do? Well Mr handy a noted Doctor phobic makes and appointment at the doctors and you can imagine the conversation...
"How can I help you sir?"
"I’m concerned I may be mad, can you check that out please......"
"Ooooooooooooooooooooooooook...." thinking dam ive got one of them, and im due on the golf course in half an hour.....
Anyway the Doctor seems amenable, things are being arranged. Probably just to get such a loony out of the office. People ive know go mad have usually been dragged off by two burly cops shouting and screaming. I think there’s little chance of him being "Sectioned" (detained involuntarily), as one has to be a danger to others of yourself to get that nowadays.
The above might be a bit jumbled and confused in place and contain random underlines, I tried to spell check it with google spell checker and it flipped out, changing things to bold and rearranging words! So the spellings crap and the words all over the place, I cant fix it so live with it. Such is the way of computers!
Oh and i got chatting to a neigbour and the fight the other night was she thought between three girls and involved some sort of preganacy advice mixed with racisum a phrase mentioned was "Wot you mean its black , your not fucking pregnant , if you are what are you doing in here...."something about black babys! charming ah obviosly the town Mensa meeting
Your face, it launched my million tears, and every day does still.
For your beauty is beyond my endurance, gasp is what I do.
Your lips, your mouth, your tongue, fonts of nectarred lust.
Gods would renounce their heavenly thrones.
From you can come what not from those above. Pretty bad so far
Your breasts, soft mounds of elegance form, so delightfully to inspire.
Your nipple budded circles of textured lust, crowns of my desire. Ah up Duuuurty
Your curves of body, I long to stroke, and touch for love and thrill.
Belly, thrills to hand, fingers loving navel touches, fun and kisses.
Your back, those many lovely hills and valleys, loves strolling ground.
To touch again, again to feel and love, more loving thrills are found.
Your arms, pleasures quiet and still, for touch with softest kiss.
Your vagina, it’s pearl so cutely hidden, your softest lips of love.
The sweetest kiss of my desire, no greater ecstasy ever bidden. God its like listening to your parents "doing it" Though I must say the wife is a pretty "fit bird"
Your derriere, mounds for loving slaps, I long to gently give.
Of course, such precious flesh, only for loving’s most tenderness.
Your lovely legs, sculpted forms so smoothly firm yet soft and warm.
To feel upon my face for thrill, and where ever you might will.
They perch upon your kiss demanding feet, elegance all to toes. Filthy bugger!
Anyway thats poetry for you. Anyway the other file is the ten commandments rewritten and expanded a bit, I wonder if that’s meaningful, 13 at the last supper and thirteen in a coven)..... So here they are.
1. Morality is an attribute of the person. It is not a cultural invention admitting of vor is it an extrinsic imposition. Ok I think I can see where this is going
2. People are sentient self governing entities with desires, ambitions, likes and dislikes. All are born equal. Status is determined only by their acts in life. People act according to the precepts of morality. They are themselves responsible for what they do. Interference with a person’s morally appropriate freedom of action is wrongful. People are not property or chattels. Fair enough
3. People limit their actions to only those which do no harm of any kind to others. However they may when it is morally appropriate interfere with or restrict the freedom of others or harm them in protecting self and others to whom they have a particular or general duty of care. Alister Crowley anyone?
4. Except in the case of chance discovery of peril or harm to another or in response to reasonable request people are not required to offer or render assistance or advice to others. However they may choose to do so, with appropriate restraint, for general benefit to all or to relieve the suffering or distress of particular others. Hummm maybe
5. Where duties to others might appear to conflict a person is required to strike a morally founded balance rejecting all influence from interested parties and rejecting own prejudice bigotry and dogma. A person is not necessarily required to please all or any particular party. If a party or group unreasonably consider that he she or they require preference their interests may be removed from or receive reduced consideration. OK Ben Franklin the second
6. It is wrongful to claim assert or ascribe moral motives to the promotion of support of or involvement in social or religious or political groups. Or to claim assert or ascribe inherent morality in respect of the ideas or beliefs or rules upon which such groups are founded or do seek to promote or impose or to their actions. Such entities are to be judged by their overt and covert effects actions and aims. It is wrongful to seek shelter from responsibility for or to claim rightness of one’s ideas or beliefs or rules or actions under a presumption of the moral rectitude of such groups. Ah now that’s more Machiavellian
7. It is wrongful to claim assert or ascribe moral motives to one’s ideas or beliefs or rules or actions under an assumption of the rightness of society’s approval or practices. One’s ideas or beliefs or rules or actions must stand upon their own moral merit. Maciavelli that seems like the last one
8. It is wrongful to deprive a person of that which is rightfully owned howsoever the deprivation might be brought about. Fair enough
9. It is wrongful to interfere with a person’s right to profit from or enjoy that which is owned howsoever the interference might be applied. yep
10. It is wrongful to deprive a person of opportunity rightfully open to him or her howsoever the deprivation might be brought about. thats society up the creek then, as thats seems to be how it all works
11. It is wrongful to fail to honour freely made agreements. Thats not going to catch on at all, insurance men wouldn’t stand for it
12. It is wrongful to induce a person to make an agreement by deceit See above, unworkable due to incredible beastliness of humans
13. It is wrongful to fail to reveal that circumstances or misunderstanding later discovered render an existing agreement impossible to honour. Errrr ok...
So there you have it pretty conclusive proof of madness, either of the above would be good enough for me but Mr Handy being of the inquiring sort requires other means of verifying things so what would you do? Well Mr handy a noted Doctor phobic makes and appointment at the doctors and you can imagine the conversation...
"How can I help you sir?"
"I’m concerned I may be mad, can you check that out please......"
"Ooooooooooooooooooooooooook...." thinking dam ive got one of them, and im due on the golf course in half an hour.....
Anyway the Doctor seems amenable, things are being arranged. Probably just to get such a loony out of the office. People ive know go mad have usually been dragged off by two burly cops shouting and screaming. I think there’s little chance of him being "Sectioned" (detained involuntarily), as one has to be a danger to others of yourself to get that nowadays.
The above might be a bit jumbled and confused in place and contain random underlines, I tried to spell check it with google spell checker and it flipped out, changing things to bold and rearranging words! So the spellings crap and the words all over the place, I cant fix it so live with it. Such is the way of computers!
Oh and i got chatting to a neigbour and the fight the other night was she thought between three girls and involved some sort of preganacy advice mixed with racisum a phrase mentioned was "Wot you mean its black , your not fucking pregnant , if you are what are you doing in here...."something about black babys! charming ah obviosly the town Mensa meeting
posted by jon | 11:15 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home